This Day (Lagos)

West Africa: Soyinka - Obama's Boycott of Nigeria in Order

Davidson Iriekpen

13 July 2009


Lagos — US President Barack Obama's visit to Ghana may have come and gone but the significance of the choice of the West African country as against Nigeria and Kenya, is still a subject discourse.

Nobel laureate, Professor Wole Soyinka, yesterday in a statement titled: "Obama's Choice' faulted what he described as the "resentment and indignation" from government over Obama's symbolic boycott of Nigeria, wondering how those in power would imagine that a leader like Obama, who ascended to power through respect for the manifested will of a people, would actually lend his presence to dignify any state that demonstrably rejects, and actively ridicules, the very means that brought him (Obama) to power.

Using the expression "blood is thicker than water" to buttress his point, the nobel laureate said Obama's gesture is intended to inform nations like Kenya and Nigeria that neither blood nor oil courses thicker than equity.

He said anyone who had read Obama's memoirs, Dreams from my Father, or knows his trajectory through childhood, intellectual and political formation,would understand immediately that he would sooner spend Thanksgiving Day with the genocidal government of Omar Bashir, or the throwback mullahs of Iran than choose either Uganda or Nigeria for a first visit that not only pursues political and economic goals, but is profoundly symbolic.

"Blood, they say, is thicker than water. Obama's gesture is intended to inform nations like Kenya and Nigeria that neither blood nor oil courses thicker than equity. How sad it makes one - no, not the studied excision by Obama of those two nations from his itinerary - but the lack of objective self-assessment within the rulership circles of such 'aggrieved' nations!

"It evokes pity for the continent as a whole, that such political leadership exists today which, sooner than retire into their gilded holes to reflect, have actually gone to battle on behalf over some mystic entitlement, since such is not sustained by any credentials in democratic and responsible governance. Of the two, the case of our own nation, Nigeria, is obviously the more pathetic.

"This, just to refresh memories, was a candidate who ensured from the beginning that he would break with corporate patronage and thus, indebtedness, and rely largely on the mass contribution of cents and pennies to ensure a mandate of maximum independence. By contrast, behold the permanent indentureship of the Nigerian power base, not merely to the moneyed oligarchy, but to the most corrupt, indeed criminal elements within that disreputable oligarchy.

"Nigeria is a nation that repeatedly blows its chances to stand tall, to present to the world a massively endowed colossus, bestriding the continent with the over-abundant productive genius of its people and the generosity of nature resources.

"What, instead, has been the actuality? A plague of incontinent rulers in relay, some in military uniform, others in civilian clothing, but all clones of one another, united in a commitment to unabashed profligacy, mutually assisted corruption and, to add insult to injury, an obsessive hankering for self-perpetuation, necessitating the cultivation of outright disdain for the elementary right of their citizens to a voice in leadership choice.

"Is this truly a nation that deserves the recognition, much less a gesture of respect, from any democratically elected leadership of the world, and one especially of such unprecedented political significance for the African continent itself?

"A decade ago, needless to say, Ghana would also have been a non-contender. But the continent has witnessed, and remains envious of, the transformation that has taken place in Ghana, an internal process of self-recovery that nearly matches that of the United States in her transition from George Bush to Barrack Obama. Among the attributes of intelligence is the ability to create, or recognize the opportunity for self-renewal.

"Nigerians, at home or residing in the United States during the past decade, have not been slow to observe that the eight previous years in United States governance were uncannily paralleled within Nigeria - eight years of waste, deception, divisiveness and corruption, of advancing bankruptcy, eight years of arrogant subversion of democratic norms .all spearheaded by a man from whom the nation, the continent and the world expected so much, eight years that sent the nation spiraling into a reverse momentum that has earned it the humiliating designation of a 'failed state'.

"Should an incoming product of the repudiation of such a shared past compromise his mandate by a significant visit to the other half, while it remains fixated and unrepentant in its perpetuation of that disreputable past?

"Of course if it were possible for Barrack Obama to visit Nigerians - the people that is - to express his condolences for such an unmerited state of affairs, parley with non-governmental organizations, exchange views with political alternatives, interact with the labour unions, hold talks with the insurgents of the oil-producing Delta region and offer direct succour to the neglected people of a benighted nation, I have no doubt whatsoever that Nigeria would indeed be his first choice. However, such a precedent being impossible - at least in these times - the only programme that remained would have been, at best, a tokenist interaction with the other Nigeria, duly vetted.

"The rest would be to wine and dine, sign some effete agreements and exchange presents with the current symbol of national decay and leadership alienation, a nation whose claim to the status of a giant is upheld only by the gigantesque dimensions of its retrogression since independence, its governance ineptness and the colossal scale of its corruption.

"Obama knows that every other hand he would shake at a state reception is steeped in sheer putrefaction from the sump of robbery, perhaps every third elbow deep in the blood of perceived political threats - across all levels of contestation."

Read comments. Write your own.

More News on allAfrica.com

Copyright © 2009 This Day. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com). To contact the copyright holder directly for corrections — or for permission to republish or make other authorized use of this material, click here.

AllAfrica aggregates and indexes content from over 125 African news organizations, plus more than 200 other sources, who are responsible for their own reporting and views. Articles and commentaries that identify allAfrica.com as the publisher are produced or commissioned by AllAfrica.

AllAfrica - All the Time
Author: Senator
Mon Jul 13 09:32:29 2009

This one of the great article that i read about africa lately. It is very honest and represent the state of affaire at this present time in Nigeria. A country with unlimited potential and all the factors neededto be the leaders of the continent. They got a POPULATION(more than 200Millions)which compare to other african state is a big MARKET on it own. They got some of the GREATEST BRAINS of the african continent, and the got an ABOUNDANCE of NATURAL RESOURCES, and they are the most PATRIOTIC people in the african continent. All this put together are the factors that… [Read Full Text]

Author: d.ofod
Mon Jul 13 20:01:49 2009

Nigerians are pathetic. Look at this whole situation. Instead of being proud of Ghana for it's achievements, or seeing what works there and requesting, demanding, or working to see it implimented in Nigeria we have written 400 articles about how nigeria is a horrible place just because Obama chose to go to Ghana out of 52 countries in africa, and not Nigeria.

This is so pathetic. Did the Spainish people cry when Obama went to Italy? Did the Poles throw a fit when Obama went to Russia?

Obama chose to go to Ghana, get over it, and most of all… [Read Full Text]

Author: adams
Mon Jul 13 12:31:03 2009

Please THISDAY, go and read this article in the Nigerian Guardian you would know the diffference between a good reporter and this very poor one. This Soyinka's paper is the main news in the Guardian. The Guardian reporter put this article so succintly and very interesting to read. THISDAY, made a mess of this article. THISDAY, you can either train your reporters well or employ more qualified people.

May I also use this to ask Mr Yar Ardua to sit up and let the people of Nigeria start to see changes in their lifes.

Author: richerson88
Mon Jul 13 13:30:10 2009

Incredible crap from a so-called laureate.

Man, you are naive to believe that Obama is some angel, some great believer in democracy. Sure, all INVADERS advocate democracy for the homeland, and preach democracy that supports their imperial interests abroad; and infiltrate any democratic formation that negates the will of finance capital, and make no mistake about it, poet, your Obama is in bed with US financial vultures; and who does know of the murderous hand of these financial vultures---from the enslavement of Africans to their oil projects in your own country, Nigeria?

You are better off writing in topos… [Read Full Text]

Author: tadeleke
Mon Jul 13 21:29:18 2009

I salute Prof. Soyinka for finding time to write this important article; and at the same time, salute the ruling class in Nigerian for being naive to the clamour of change in an ever changing world. President Obama´s choice is wise. period!

Author: AFRICA MUST STOP LEASING, SELLING INVITING PARASITE NATIONS ON AFRICAN S
Tue Jul 14 05:38:17 2009

Something about us -- Africans seemn to push us into the path of negativity and backward thinking. Years ago, NELSON MANDELA CALLED FOR AN 'AFRICAN RENAISSANCE.' To this date, there seem to be no sign of an African renaissance taking place. Had we taken the wheel and gotten on the BALL ten years ago, Africa would not be in a position of begging, hoping and allowing foreign 'parasitic' nations to make deals with African nations for resources on ONE SIDE OF THEIR FACE -- WHILE ARMING AND PROMOTING GENOCIDE WITH THE ENEMIES OF AFRICANS ON THE OTHER SIDE… [Read Full Text]

Author: zwakausu
Tue Jul 14 18:54:55 2009

Soyinka's reaction is an accurate, but sad testimony to a nation speedily progressing backward to the stone age. Each time I read such articles from such well informed senior citizens, I weep for the over onw hundred million Nigerians who are victims of the mass looting by a few degenerate crooks. It is all the more frustrating because the perpertators are deaf, dumb and blind. They glory in their ill-acquired loot, and feel that every other person with a dissenting voice is either unpatriotic, misguided, or uninformed. This is one country where the leaders have no shame. Whatever happens under… [Read Full Text]

Author: 2ndeY
Wed Jul 15 08:15:20 2009

I don't see any reason why Nigerians should complain about Obama's visit to Ghana.....cos i believed Obama's would surely have his reasons for chosen Ghana not Nigeria or his home town.

So, i think we should stop the complaination and work effectively on the act of selfishness in our country.



Sign up for FREE daily 'top headlines' by email »


SELECT
SELECT

Most Active Stories: West Africa

Topics